Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
“Washington law clearly states that if a party files a motion to intervene prior to the commencement of trial, that motion is timely.” (See Am. Disc. Corp. v. Saratoga W. Inc. (1972) 81 Wn.2d 34, 43, 499 P.2d 869; Dolan v. King Cnty., No. 44982-0-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014).)
“But post-judgment, the superior court should allow a motion to intervene only upon a strong showing after considering all circumstances, including prior notice, prejudice to the other parties, and reasons for and length of the delay.” (See Dolan v. King Cnty., No. 44982-0-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014).)
“The court rule governing intervention, CR 24, provides in relevant part: upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action ... (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties.” (See Wilson v. Mt. Solo Landfill, Inc., No. 44938-2-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2014).)
“Our Supreme Court has interpreted CR 24(a) as containing four requirements that a party must satisfy before the trial court must grant the party's motion to intervene as a matter of right:
(See Wilson v. Mt. Solo Landfill, Inc., No. 44938-2-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2014).)
“If [one] fails to satisfy any of these four requirements, [the court] need not examine the remaining requirements and must uphold the trial court's order denying its motion to intervene.” (See id.)
“We will reverse a trial court's denial of a party's motion to intervene as a matter of right only if an error of law has occurred." (See Westerman v. Cory, (1994) 125 Wn.2d 277, 302, 892 P.2d 1067; Wilson v. Mt. Solo Landfill, Inc., No. 44938-2-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2014).)
“Thus, to determine the validity of a motion to intervene, courts look to the pleadings, accepting the well pleaded allegations therein as true.” (See id.)
“We review a superior court's decision to grant or deny a motion to intervene on grounds of timeliness, as well as its decision to limit the scope of intervention generally, for an abuse of discretion.” (See Kreidler v. Eikenberry, (1989) 111 Wn.2d 828, 832, 766 P.2d 438; Dolan v. King Cnty., No. 44982-0-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014).)
“A superior court abuses its discretion where either no reasonable person would adopt the superior court's position, or the superior court based its ruling on an erroneous legal conclusion.” (See Dolan v. King Cnty., No. 44982-0-II, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014).)
It is well settled that “intervention in a dependency action by anyone other than the child's natural parent will rarely be appropriate. Any such decision permitting intervention is within the court's informed discretion and will be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.” (See In re Welfare of Coverdell (1984) 39 Wn.App. 887, 891, 696 P.2d 1241; In re Dependency of A.D., 74227-2-I, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Sep. 6, 2016).)
It is also well settled that “in determining whether an applicant has an interest sufficient to intervene as a matter of right, a court makes a case-by-case analysis, balancing the relative concerns of the prospective intervenors, the original parties to the action, and the public in effecting the efficient resolution of the controversy. The interest that the intervenor seeks to protect must be one recognized by law.” (See In re Dependency of L.B., No. 48602-1-I, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2001).)
1 2 FILED 2023 MAY 04 11:02 AM 3 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK 4 E-FILED CASE #: 23-4-03401-2 SEA 5 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR T
May 04, 2023
Active 05/04/2023
King County, WA
May 04, 2023
FILED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MAR 13 2023 SUPERIOR COURT CLERK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING In the Matter of the Estate of No. 23-4 020.07 -SKN5 Last Will and Testament Forrest Dennis Tyree, Deceased. eevrvrvr Last Will and Testament is attached. LAW OFFICES OF Last Will and Testament - Page 1 P. STEPHEN AITA, PLLC 3010 HARBORVIEW DRIVE, SUITE 30) GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON 98335 (253) 858-5434 * FAX (253) 276-2373 steve@aitalaw.comLAST W
Mar 13, 2023
Active 03/14/2023
King County, WA
Mar 13, 2023
FILED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MAR 13 2023 SUPERIOR COURT CLERK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING In the Matter of the Estate of No. 23-4 020.07 -SKN5 Last Will and Testament Forrest Dennis Tyree, Deceased. eevrvrvr Last Will and Testament is attached. LAW OFFICES OF Last Will and Testament - Page 1 P. STEPHEN AITA, PLLC 3010 HARBORVIEW DRIVE, SUITE 30) GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON 98335 (253) 858-5434 * FAX (253) 276-2373 steve@aitalaw.comLAST W
Mar 13, 2023
Active 03/14/2023
King County, WA
Mar 13, 2023
FILED 2023 JAN 17 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK CASE #: 23-2-00949-5 KNT Superior Court of Washington, County of King Case No. Tulay Crosbie 06/03/1946
Jan 17, 2023
Completed 01/17/2023
King County, WA
Jan 17, 2023
FILED 2022 DEC 27 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK CASE #: 22-2-21145-8 KNT Superior Court of Washington, County of King
Dec 27, 2022
Completed 12/27/2022
King County, WA
Dec 27, 2022
FILED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON JAN 06 2021 SEA SUPERIOR COURT CLERK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING In Re Estate of: Case Number: 21-4-00160-6SEA AUGUST DE LOS REYES, Deceased. Will. {_118350428.v1 ial Rd 9 NVC 1282Prepared by: Riddell Williams P.S. 1001 Fourth Avenue Suite 4500 Seattle, WA 98154-1192 (206) 624-3600 4820-4001-1057.01 65993.00001 WILL OF AUGUST DE LOS REYES Dated: May 19, 2016WILL OF AUGUST DE LOS REYES I, AUGUST DE L
Jan 06, 2021
Active 01/06/2021
King County, WA
Jan 06, 2021
Estate
FILED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT JUN 12 2020 OF 20 -4-033a0-8 5H SEA SIGWULF HERMANN SUPERIOR COURT CLERK I, SIGWULF HERMANN, of King County, Washington, being of sound mind and memory, and not acting under duress, menace, fraud or undue influence, do hereby make, publish and declare this to be my LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT. I I am married to KAREN S. HERMANN and I have two children, namely: ANNA E. HERMANN, born March 14, 1982, of Seattle, Washington; and KRISTINA M. HERMA
Jun 08, 2020
Active 06/08/2020
King County, WA
Jun 12, 2020
Estate
25 26 FILED 18 MAY 31 PM 12:25 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 17-4-03260- THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ) Case No. 17-4-03260-1 SEA ) JEANNE DELORIS NEWTON ) DECLARATION OF COMPLETION OF ) PROBATE OF TESTATE ESTATE AND Deceased. |) DISCHARGE OF PERSONAL ) REPRESENTATIVE ) GARRY SOBECK, the Personal Representative of the above-referenced estate, who has acquired nonintervention powers, does hereby declare that the administrati
King County, WA
May 31, 2018
NE Re eh meee ae tame oil! aa FILED 17 AUG 29. PH 1:55 Lost Wil and “bsiament 6-4SEA VONJA CLUPHF I, VONJA CLUPHF, now domiciled in Kenmore, King County, Washington, declare this to be my Will. I hereby revoke all wills and codicils executed by me prior to the date of this instrument. I. IDENTIFICATION OF FAMILY My immediate family consists of my spouse, JUNIOR GEORGE CLUPHF, and my children, ROBERT L. STRAUSS, GEORGE A. STRAUSS, and JOHN D, STRAUSS. No other children have been born to or
Aug 29, 2017
Completed 08/29/2017
King County, WA
Aug 29, 2017
Will Only
oO ON DA HW BF BW NY NN NY NR SF Be Be eB eB ew Be Be ew B&R SF SSR S FSeERUDRBDESH TS FILED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SEP 27 2016 SUPERIOR COURT CLERK BY Christine Soliman DEPUTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY In re Marriage of: ) ) ATIYA M. TAYLOR MCGHEE, ) NO. 15-3-02129-3 SEA Petitioner, ) 15-2-05018-4 SEA and ) ) PARENTING PLAN ) Final Order (PP) PATRICK MCGHEE, ) Respondent. } ) This Parenting Plan is the Final Parenting Plan signed by the Court pursuant t
Apr 01, 2015
Completed 07/25/2017
King County, WA
Sep 27, 2016
Dissolution w/ Children
05/02/2016 12:00 AM
eo 6 I DN fF WY NNN NY KY YE Be Be Be Be Bee Be ee A fF YW YN |= Ss © eI DA UWF BH HEH S FILED 16 MAR 17 AM 10:10 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 15-2-05018-4 SE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY In re Marriage of: ) ) ATIYA M. TAYLOR MCGHEE, ) NO. 15-3-02129-3 SEA Petitioner, 15-2-05018-4 SEA ) and } DECLARATION OF ATIYA ) TAYLOR MCGHEE IN SUPPORT PATRICK MCGHEE, ) OF PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF ) DVPO AND MOTION TO MODIFY Respondent. ) TEMPORA
Feb 27, 2015
Completed 04/05/2016
King County, WA
Mar 17, 2016
Domestic Violence
03/31/2016 12:00 AM
FILED 12 JUL 26 PM 4:00 THE HONORABLE CAROL A SCHARIRA JUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLE! E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 12-2-21829. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY GEOFF TATE and SUSAN TATE, a married couple Plaintiffs, Vv. EDDIE JACKSON and TERESA GOLDEN-JACKSON, a married couple; SCOTT ROCKENFIELD and MISTY ROCKENFIELD, a married couple; MICHAEL WILTON and KERRIE LYNN WILTON, a married couple; TRI-RYCHE, CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; QUEENSRYCHE MERCHANDISING, INC., a Washington cor
Jun 22, 2012
Completed 06/19/2014
King County, WA
Jul 26, 2012
Injunction
02/10/2014 12:00 AM
FILED 12 JUL 26 PM 4:00 THE HONORABLE CAROL A SCHARIRA JUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLE! E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 12-2-21829. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY GEOFF TATE and SUSAN TATE, a married couple Plaintiffs, Vv. EDDIE JACKSON and TERESA GOLDEN-JACKSON, a married couple; SCOTT ROCKENFIELD and MISTY ROCKENFIELD, a married couple; MICHAEL WILTON and KERRIE LYNN WILTON, a married couple; TRI-RYCHE, CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; QUEENSRYCHE MERCHANDISING, INC., a Washington cor
Jun 22, 2012
Completed 06/19/2014
King County, WA
Jul 26, 2012
Injunction
02/10/2014 12:00 AM
WILL 09-4-03330-4SEA oF VESTA S. SWALL thas I, VESTA S. SWALL, of North Bend, Washington being of legal age and of sound and disposing mind and memory and.not acting under duress, menace, fraud or undue influence of any person whomsoever, declare this to be my Will and revoke all prior Wills and Codicils made by me. ARTICLE 1, FAMILY AND WISHES; - I declare that I am a single person and have one son, ROBERT L. SWALL, of Corvallis, Oregon. I also have four grandchildren, DALE, ELIZABETH, MAR
Jun 26, 2009
Completed 06/26/2009
King County, WA
Jun 26, 2009
Will Only
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY AERICA BANKS, NO, 07-2-00542-1 SEA Petitioner, RESPONDENT’S SUPPLEMENTAL vs. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE xxxxxxxxx REIDLINGER, PROTECTION ORDER Respondent. Hearing Date: May 3, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. This memorandum is submitted in response to the documents submitted by Ms. Banks on April 13, 2007 (while Pro Se), and to the supplemental memorandum and supporting documents submitted by her co
Feb 23, 2007
Completed 05/03/2007
King County, WA
May 01, 2007
Domestic Violence
(2)-FM-Family Law Motions
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.